Due Diligence

Molfar Intelligence Firm’s due diligence services provide a full evaluation to support informed investment decisions. This includes analysis of a company's financials, operations, legal standing, and reputation. 

The review covers fact-checking, background analysis of key management, and comparison of official figures with the actual situation on the ground.

As an outcome, you receive a detailed report with clear conclusions and recommendations based on verified data.

Our approach to investigative screening is a systematic process that gives the client a clear understanding of both risks and opportunities for the business. 

Corporate Due Diligence Investigations

Your company may need due diligence services before making big investments, mergers, or hiring decisions. Such checks are routine for companies in such sectors as IT, finance, tech, defence, and more. Companies leverage due diligence investigations as a risk mitigation strategy to avoid reputational damage or fund losses. 

Due Diligence Screening for Operational Assessments

Such services require overviewing of the internal conditions of the company to reveal major red flags. It is possible to uncover information on the state of equipment, supply chain issues, workplace discrepancies, non-compliance with industry standards, and more.

Due Diligence Investigations in Finance

This type of due diligence investigation aims to reveal the true financial state of the company, especially before a merger, investment, or partnership. Our services can be used to reveal data about the real financial state of the company, its financial projections, debt, credit, revenue, tax history, and more. 

Legal and Regulatory Compliance

Companies that intend to enter a new market, make acquisitions or mergers, or partner with new clients need a legal overview to inform their decision-making. Molfar Intelligence Firm can uncover any previous legal disputes, money laundering, embezzlement, tax evasion, and other problems. 

Why Choose Molfar Due Diligence Services?

See Related Cases

Overview of how we approach providing our screening services, with short summaries of the real cases of our clients. 

Case 1: Production Screening

Task: An investigation of a paper products manufacturer for an investor. The client was a venture fund investing at the pre-seed and seed stages in technology startups across the EU and MENA regions. Their portfolio includes over 50 companies with a total valuation of $1.2 billion and an exit success rate of 22%.
Request: Conduct due diligence investigations of a firm on behalf of an investor.
Solution: An in-depth assessment was carried out, including analysis of production capacity, equipment condition, distribution channels, and security measures. Employee complaints were also reviewed.

Findings:

• Outdated equipment requiring maintenance.
• The customer base is limited to the domestic market.
• Decreased raw material supply compared to the previous year.
• Lack of video surveillance and physical security.
• Employee complaints regarding delayed salary payments.

Investor’s Decision: The investment was declined due to high-risk factors.

Case 2: Defence Screening 

Task: An investigation of a defense startup for a venture fund.
Request: Conduct a thorough due diligence checking of a defense-sector startup on behalf of a venture capital fund. The audit was commissioned by a venture fund specializing in investments in dual-use and defenсe tech startups at early stages. Their portfolio includes over 30 companies, 4 of which have already secured contracts with NATO government agencies, with an ROI on exits exceeding 3.5x.
Solution: A full investigation was conducted, covering analysis of the business model, financial statements, investor pitch deck, assets, and unique selling proposition (USP). A physical and technical inspection of the site was carried out, along with a background check of the executive team.

Findings:

• Discrepancy between financial performance and projected figures.
• Lack of a clear, unique selling proposition (USP).
• Legal risk due to a potential non-compete agreement violation by the founder.
• Unclear understanding of the end user and overreliance on a single use-case scenario.
• Insufficient engineering expertise within the management team — prior experience limited to marketing and finance.
• Lack of established business processes and quality control systems.

Investor’s Decision: The report was an effective risk mitigation measure. An investment was declined due to high legal risks and the potential for startup insolvency.